The Dr. Warren Gage Podcast
A Response to Wesley Huff: The Longer Ending of Mark Is Authentic! (Part 2)
by Dr. Warren Gage
Episode Description:
Recently, Christian apologist Wesley Huff released a video arguing that Mark 16:9–20, a passage often referred to as “the Longer Ending of Mark,” is not authentic Scripture. Sadly, many textual critical scholars today have come to the same conclusion. But Dr. Warren Gage believes the exact opposite is true. In this two-part series, he makes a compelling case for the authenticity of the Longer Ending of Mark, arguing that a careful literary analysis affirms its rightful place in the biblical canon. For the second lesson, Dr. Gage explains how a literary pattern called “chiasm” proves the Longer Ending of Mark must be authentic. If you’re interested in diving deeper, check out Dr. Gage’s ebook on the Longer Ending of Mark here.
Please support us by subscribing on one or more of your favorite platforms below!
A Response to Wesley Huff: The Longer Ending of Mark is Authentic! (Part 1)
by Dr. Warren Gage
Episode Description:
Recently, Christian apologist Wesley Huff released a video arguing that Mark 16:9–20, a passage often referred to as “the Longer Ending of Mark,” is not authentic Scripture. Sadly, many textual critical scholars today have come to the same conclusion. But Dr. Warren Gage believes the exact opposite is true. In this two-part series, he makes a compelling case for the authenticity of the Longer Ending of Mark, arguing that a careful literary analysis affirms its rightful place in the biblical canon. For the first lesson, Dr. Gage explains how the Elijah Pattern in Mark’s Gospel proves the Longer Ending of Mark must be authentic. If you’re interested in diving deeper, check out Dr. Gage’s ebook on the Longer Ending of Mark here.
Please support us by subscribing on one or more of your favorite platforms below!
The Surprising Case for the Longer Ending of Mark (eBook)
Biblical and legal experts Dr. Warren Gage & J. Randy Beck make a compelling case for the authenticity of the longer ending of Mark’s Gospel. They identify key literary patterns and structures that serve as evidence of its authenticity.